Skip to main content

Is IT leading Transformation or Transformation leads IT?


Transformation has been an undeniable reality for IT since the beginning of the times. Whether it has been called process reengineering, business adaptability, technology agility, cost saving programs or more recently IT consumerization-commoditization, the fact is that we have never been laid back managing the IT agenda.

Transformation is linking several variables together to come up with the most likely and add-value scenario for the business. These scenarios are in the context of reducing costs, increase productive, regain business momentum; meaning all of them are looking to a better business positioning for which IT will have to respond in a prompt and efficient manner.  

I often went reading IT news around the world but also having interesting discussions with some colleagues about this non-stop subject of business transformation and the required IT support. As the debate went on, I became overwhelmed with the feeling of loneliness as regards my own views. While many of my colleagues strongly defend the idea that IT should always follow business directions regarding the required transformation, I am more in favour of a balanced participation of IT on the transformation agenda.



This idea links to the vision about the real forces driving transformation, the push and the pull ones. To help with the introduction of these concepts let me tell you that “push” forces are those who resulted from the communicated business requirement, where the “pull” are the ones that resulted from a timely and proactive IT innovation activities. These are among others some main IT activities that have to be always present in your IT processes framework.  In between the “pull” and the “push” we always find the Integrate layer, which is where we can define first and then manage a proper and balanced transformation activity plan.

In other words, transformation has to reap the benefits from an intimate collaboration between IT and the other business areas, not only at the deployment project phase but also from the definition stage. IT has to create an environment that supports the pursuit of transformation through the targets defined by the organization.

Finally my experience also says that whatever you do when managing IT transformation, please remember that most of the benefits the business will get from the transformation will result from a well communicated Change Management agenda, and this one has to properly manage and translate business requirements into IT capabilities, at strategic, tactical and operational levels. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

IT Metrics - CIO Agenda and challenges

Today’s role of CIO is probably the hardest and complex role you can find in any business organization.  A CIO has to properly combine multiple skills and competences to become effective on the way he/she manage both, business and IT requirements. This is to me the main difference when comparing the CIO’s role with other C-level executives. While the COO, CFO, etc. are mainly focusing on their own areas of responsibility (Operations, Finance, Marketing, etc.), the CIO has to drive a complex agenda to accommodate IT related matters to what the rest of the business organization require from them. This is one of the reasons why IT/IS has always been seen from the rest of the business as support function and not as an add value activity by itself, unless when we talk about technology or innovation companies where IT is perceived as a key business driver.   Today’s CIO has to drive business processes innovation in a way that the rest of the C-level c...

IT Metrics - IT positioning at business level

An IT department has to be technology or management driven organization? This is a key question mark for many CEOs when confronted with the need to bring their own IT organizations to a different level of maturity. If he decides in favor of a technology driven organization then the IT department and its responsible person will be normally subordinated to someone at the Company Board level. In Europe the Finance Director is one of the first and common choices that many companies are following, as historically the Finance Director – CFO has been in charge of large company projects having high financial impact. If on the contrary the CEO decides that there is a clear need for the business organization to improve the overall IT performance then he will take the decision to bring his Head of IT to the Board level position. This dilemma differs between regions when comparing the number of companies in Europe having the IT responsible at the Company board level with oth...

IT Metrics - How we should manage Information Technology

The management of IT must be based on three key elements; - Focusing on expertise - Ensuring business integration - Generating a new breed of innovative strategic thinking Nowadays the Time to Market concept is a major business requirement, not only for the Fast Consumer goods companies but for all the business that really desire to be succeed in a very competitive and changing environments, hence the need for the IT departments to organize their own resources focusing mainly on a primary activity or function. Doing that way we will increase efficiency (by reducing development and deployment required times) but also effectiveness (maximising the project benefits by reducing costs throughout the entire innovation funnel). Integration with the rest of the business in an intimate relationship is also key as it will increase business knoledge and sense of belonging. The first one is a fundamental enabler for IT organization to properly and timely traslate business requirem...